• 患者服务: 与癌共舞小助手
  • 微信号: yagw_help22

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

开启左侧

[基础知识] 给ICB免疫减毒增效的 药物(十九)--肌苷、β-葡聚糖

[复制链接]
3221 0 自学自救 发表于 昨天 17:11 |

马上注册,结交更多好友,享用更多功能,让你轻松玩转社区。

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?立即注册

x
第一部分 肌苷( J+ D9 K$ u  `) [

/ ^" m, y5 E2 q& }6 L
' h% [  Q' l5 S8 `0 I( W! P《Inosine enhances the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid tumors: A randomized, controlled, Phase 2 study》 一文介绍了一项前瞻性随机对照二期临床试验:
. R  w3 Y5 e, X8 x) u 4 f, Z8 E9 `7 t3 `/ p+ K: \5 t
1、入组患者:172名晚期实体瘤患者,分为 ICB免疫治疗+肌苷组和 ICB免疫治疗组不联合肌苷(该组部分患者联合了化疗或者靶向)两组,每组86名患者。3 Y7 ], R, q# A
* q; k4 o; T* b. K. H6 w
2、肌苷用法:口服肌苷片,每天三次,每次0.2克。1 h& D2 l6 R1 ~* u
# S! G+ G  j/ a) T9 q
3、试验结果:肌苷组和非肌苷组中位PFS (95% CI)分别为7.00(5.31-8.69)和4.40(3.10-5.70)个月(风险比[HR]0.63;95%置信区间为0.44–0.90,p= 0.011),肌苷组PFS提高有统计学意义。ORR分别为26.7%和15.1%(p= 0.061),肌苷组ORR有改善。非肌苷组中位OS为29.67个月(95% CI 17.40–41.94),肌苷组中位OS尚未达到。9 ^3 T6 W9 H1 A* U) B1 s1 q& a
" b6 P- z2 Y; [2 m( {
肌苷组和非肌苷组分别有25名(29%)和31名(36%)患者出现3级和4级不良反应,肌苷组的不良反应趋于减少。
" F- h, w7 i6 d; t. d* y$ o9 S . ^1 u6 ?6 Z8 A8 \- `& B5 X

: W# }/ I( G  y3 j
" P4 y9 C$ q$ M- `- |8 o第二部分 β-葡聚糖
: g, L2 z! D( H
# ]6 W3 g# o- L5 a 2 ~9 ]) p+ w  }) a- l
《β-glucan combined with Envafolimab and Endostar as immune rechallenge for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer》一文介绍了一项前瞻性随机对照二期临床试验,β-葡聚糖+pd-1i 恩沃利 + 抗血管生成药物治疗先前pd-1i治疗失败的非小细胞肺癌。
0 \6 r/ O- J: D% b $ h5 M8 @! \- b8 d$ }
1、入组患者:23名晚期非小细胞肺癌患者,这些患者之前用pd-1i治疗都已经失败。- w+ Q; l$ y" T, F

( h% b7 ~- @- Z4 U2、β-葡聚糖用法:每天两次,每次500毫克。8 h9 U2 F, E4 U1 U7 i: t1 u4 k5 n" P0 H9 z
8 S* |2 Y) f5 B! b; o
3、试验结果:ORR 21.7%,DCR 73.9%.,PFS 4.3个月,OS 8.9个月。PD-L1阳性和阴性亚组之间的mPFS有显著差异(6.3个月对2.3个月,p = 0.002)。: l* C- E* F: x) R: R+ W! O- Q( L- _
5 ~+ ]. Z  \0 f2 G4 y6 Q
52.2%的患者发生了治疗相关的不良事件。最常见的原因是甲状腺功能减退(26.1%)和疲劳(26.1%)。报告了2例(8.7%)3级不良事件。未观察到与死亡相关的不良反应。
9 V5 y5 n  c3 \/ ~) G 5 b. V! U  m" e; |' T+ S) w
蛋白质组学分析显示CASP-8、ARG1、MMP12、CD28和CXCL5的水平与对治疗的抗性相关,而CD40-L和EGF的水平与有利的反应相关。' t: r  E8 s6 P. O5 c7 w

) w5 B* F$ `1 \% R$ y1 |9 \& l0 t(因为患者都是之前用pd-1i都已经失败的患者,所以ORR 21.7%,DCR 73.9% 还是很不错的)0 B8 V/ U' T0 P. u/ s
/ S: p- E9 L% P1 ^; m7 o" S  F' v

8 A; z& G7 t" B" _8 @. q1 zI 《Inosine enhances the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid tumors: A randomized, controlled, Phase 2 study》
# e/ z/ k) r0 _1 o- I ! r3 V& D+ H! ^
Background: This study aimed to evaluate whether inosine enhances the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in human malignant solid tumors.
+ M+ N; p' a% |' [) n1 D ( }( _5 ^' R/ Y+ @
Methods: This single-center, prospective, randomized, open-label study was conducted, from January 2021 to December 2022, in Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, and participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the inosine (trial) or non-inosine (control) group that received inosine (dosage: 0.2 g, three times/day) + PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor or only PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor ± targeted ± chemotherapy, respectively. Efficacy was assessed every 6 weeks (i.e., after every two-three treatment cycles). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR); the secondary endpoints were disease control rate, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05809336).8 U8 e  R# J6 D6 A! F9 h1 G9 ~

4 q  B: @4 Q- l5 CResults: Among the 172 participants with advanced malignant solid tumors, 86 each were assigned to the inosine and non-inosine groups, wherein the median PFS (95% CI) was 7.00 (5.31-8.69) and 4.40 (3.10-5.70) months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 0.63; 95% CI 0.44-0.90, p = 0.011), and the ORR was 26.7% and 15.1%, respectively (p = 0.061). In the inosine and non-inosine groups, the median OS was not reached and was 29.67 (95% CI 17.40-41.94) months, respectively (HR 1.05 [95% CI 0.59-1.84], p = 0.874). Compared with the non-inosine group, the median PFS and ORR of the inosine group were significantly prolonged and improved in the multiple exploratory subgroup analyses. The safety analysis showed that Grades 3 and 4 adverse reactions occurred in 25 (29%) and 31 (36%) patients in the inosine and non-inosine groups, respectively, and tended to decrease in the inosine group compared with the non-inosine group.2 e+ e; Y5 a8 e8 s) E$ ^
8 ]0 N1 `& F+ g& H7 D& s# F
Conclusion: Inosine had a tendency to enhance the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and reduced immunotherapy-related adverse reactions.
( f$ a8 l5 i1 [. h9 r3 `+ q
# F6 S' X' ^; f4 A* S( } ( [6 e. K, Q1 w) R+ y1 J1 g6 L
7 o5 a( Q. }+ D; b4 c
II 《β-glucan combined with Envafolimab and Endostar as immune rechallenge for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer》
  G) ?0 k+ j+ X0 W / x8 q! Z6 F/ v5 ~& R* L2 t
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge has emerged as a prominent study area in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). β-glucan was reported to reverse resistance to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors by regulating the tumor microenvironment. In this self-initiated clinical trial (ChiCTR2100054796), NSCLC participants who have previously failed anti-PD-1 therapy received β-glucan (500 mg, bid, d1-21), Envafolimab (300 mg, d1) and Endostar (210 mg, civ72h) every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The clinical efficacy and adverse events were observed, while serum samples were collected for proteomic analysis.
4 w8 _* Y( i' [1 \
1 _) l; I* z0 `. J% B) @7 s- m( c/ cResults: Twenty Three patients were enrolled from January 2022 to March 2023 (median age, 65 years; male, n = 18 [78.3%]; squamous NSCLC, n = 9 [39.1%]; mutant type, n = 13 [56.5%]). The overall response rate (ORR) was 21.7% and disease control rate (DCR) was 73.9%. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) was 4.3 months [95% CI: 2.0-6.6] and 9.8 months [95% CI: 7.2-12.4], respectively. The mPFS between PD-L1 positive and negative subgroup has significant difference (6.3 months vs. 2.3 months, p = 0.002). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 52.2% of patients. The most common TRAEs were hypothyroidism (26.1%) and fatigue (26.1%). 2 (8.7%) grade 3 adverse events were reported. No adverse reaction related deaths have been observed. Proteomic analysis revealed that the levels of CASP-8, ARG1, MMP12, CD28 and CXCL5 correlated with resistance to the treatment while the levels of CD40-L and EGF related to the favorable response." T. d) b4 `) ?
0 M& ?& _. G7 s/ N1 h% O2 y
Conclusion: β-glucan combined with Envafolimab and Endostar has considerable efficacy and safety for immune rechallenge in metastatic NSCLC patients who failed of anti-PD-1 treatment previously, especially for PD-L1 positive patients.

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

  • 回复
  • 转播
  • 评分
  • 分享
帮助中心
网友中心
购买须知
支付方式
服务支持
资源下载
售后服务
定制流程
关于我们
关于我们
友情链接
联系我们
关注我们
官方微博
官方空间
微信公号
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表